CBP Officer Entrance Exam | Questions with 100% Correct Answers | Updated | Guaranteed A+
Question :Some 480,000 immigrants were living in a certain
country in 1999. Although most of these immigrants were not employed in professional occupations, many of them were.For instance, many of them were engineers and many of them were nurses. Very few of these immigrants were librarians, another professional occupation.
From the information given above, it can validly concluded
that, in 1999, in the country described above:
- Most immigrants were either engineers or nurses
- It is not the case that some of the nurses were immigrants
- None of the engineers were immigrants
- Some of the engineers were immigrants
Correct answer:D) Some of the engineers were immigrants
Question :A trucking company can act as a 'common carrier' -
for hire to the general public at published rates. As a common carrier, the trucking company is liable for any cargo damage, unless the company can show that it was not negligent. If the company can demonstrate that it was not negligent, then it is not liable for cargo damage. In contrast, a 'contract carrier' ( a trucking company hired by a shipper under a specific contract) is only responsible for cargo damage spelled out in the contract. A Claus Inc. tractor-trailer, acting under common carrier authority, was in a 5-vehivle accident that damaged its cargo. A Nichlos Inc. tractor-trailer, acting under contract carrier authority, was involved in the same accident, and its cargo was also damaged.
From the information given above, it can be validly
concluded that, in reference to the accident:
- If Claus Inc. is liable, then it can show that it was not
negligent
- If Claus Inc. cannot show that it was not negligent, then it
is not liable
- If Claus Inc. can show that it was not negligent, then it is
not liable
- If Nichols Inc. is liable, then it cannot show that it is
negligent
Correct answer:C) If Claus Inc. can show that it was not
negligent, then it is not liable
Question :A rapidly changing technical environment in
government is promoting greater reliance on electronic mail (e-mail) systems. As this usage grows, there are increasing chances of conflict between the users' expectations of privacy and public access rights. In some investigation, access to ALL e-mail, including those messages stored in archival files and messages outside the scope of the investigation, has been sought and granted. In spite of this, some people send messages through e-mail that would never be said face-to- face or written formally.
From the information given above, it CANNOT be validly
concluded that:
- Some e-mails messages that have been requested as part of
investigations have contained messages that would neve be said face-to-face
- Some messages that people would never say face-to-face
are sent in e-mail messages
- Some e-mail messages have been requested as part of
investigations
- E-mail messages have not been exempted from
investigations
Correct answer:A) Some e-mails messages that have been
requested as part of investigations have contained messages that would neve be said face-to-face
Question :Often, crimes are characterized as either "malum in
se"-inherently evil-or "malum prohibitum"-criminal because